🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.